would you care to make a statement?Oppenheimer · 2023 — Chapter 26 of 28 · 2'38" · C1
Hill Blames Strauss at the Hearing, Explained: made mincemeat out of
At the confirmation hearing, David Hill testifies that most scientists want Strauss out of government. Pressed on why, he rejects the security explanation: the real cause was Strauss's private vindictiveness toward Oppenheimer, rooted in an old public humiliation that Strauss "never forgave."
What happens
David Hill is called to testify about Lewis Strauss. He grants Strauss's long government service, then says most scientists would rather see him out of government, and not because of security: it was Strauss's personal vindictiveness against Oppenheimer, driven by an old humiliation after Oppenheimer demolished his position on isotope shipments.
Listen for
made mincemeat out ofsit in judgment ofthe animus ofpilloried
Phrase of the scene
made mincemeat out of
把某人或某观点驳得体无完肤、剁成肉酱
希尔在参议院作证,说明斯特劳斯对奥本海默的敌意源自一次被当众驳倒的经历。
She made mincemeat out of his argument in the debate.
Also in this scene
- sit in judgment of
对某人作出审判、站在评判者的位置上
- the animus of
某人的敌意、恶意(多指深藏而持续的)
- pilloried
被公开羞辱;被众人当众嘲骂
Everything marked in this scene
33 notes across 33 lines
I've been asked to testify about Lewis Strauss.A man who has given years of service in high positions of governmentand who is known to be earnest, hardworking and intelligent.The views I have to express are my own,but I believe that much I have to say will help to indicatewhy most of the scientists in this country would prefer to see Mr. Strausscompletely out of government.You're... You're referring to the hostility of certain scientists directed toward Mr. Strauss because of his commitment to securityBecause of the personal vindictivenessstress
Because of the personal vindictivenessthat Robert Oppenheimer is now being pilloried and put through an ordeal because he expressed his honest opinions.passive progressive
that Robert Oppenheimer is now being pilloried and put through an ordeal because he expressed his honest opinions.stress
that Robert Oppenheimer is now being pilloried and put through an ordeal because he expressed his honest opinions.Dr. Bush, I thought I was performing a service to my country when hearing this case.No board in this country should sit in judgment of a man because he expressed strong opinions.modal
No board in this country should sit in judgment of a man because he expressed strong opinions.If you want to try that case, you should try me.Dr. Hill, we've already heard that Mr. Strauss did not bring the chargesor participate in the hearings against Dr. Oppenheimer.The Oppenheimer matter was initiated and carried through largely through the animus of Lewis Strauss.The Oppenheimer matter was initiated and carried through largely through the animus of Lewis Strauss.Oppenheimer made mincemeat out of Strauss's position on the shipment of isotopes to Norway,liaison
Oppenheimer made mincemeat out of Strauss's position on the shipment of isotopes to Norway,and Strauss never forgave him this public humiliation.Another controversy between them centered around their differences in judgment on how the H-bomb would contribute to national security.Another controversy between them centered around their differences in judgment on how the H-bomb would contribute to national security.Strauss turned to the personnel security system in order to destroy Oppenheimer's effectiveness,Strauss turned to the personnel security system in order to destroy Oppenheimer's effectiveness,purpose clause
Strauss turned to the personnel security system in order to destroy Oppenheimer's effectiveness,and Strauss was able to find a few ambitious men who also disagreed with Oppenheimer's positionsand envied him his prestige in government circles.and envied him his prestige in government circles.Hill Blames Strauss at the Hearing, explained
What's really going on
The scene is the trial's counterargument, and it is delivered in the calm of a sworn statement rather than a speech. Hill is careful to concede Strauss's virtues first—earnest, hardworking, intelligent—so that what follows lands harder. His explanation of the case is one sentence of motive: "The Oppenheimer matter was initiated and carried through largely through the animus of Lewis Strauss." The rest is the paper trail of a grudge, from an isotope dispute in which Oppenheimer "made mincemeat out of Strauss's position" to a security system used to destroy a rival's influence. What makes the scene sting is that nobody here is shouting; Hill even pre-empts the charge of bias by admitting he has become stirred, and then finishes the job.
Theme
Listen for
- personal vindictiveness — stress
- pilloried and put through an ordeal — stress
- made mincemeat out of — liaison
No board in this country should sit in judgment of a man because he expressed strong opinions.The principle Hill states: a hearing must not punish someone for holding unpopular views.
If you want to try that case, you should try me.He offers himself as a target, making the accusation personal and public.
The Oppenheimer matter was initiated and carried through largely through the animus of Lewis Strauss.The key claim: the case was powered by Strauss's personal hostility, not security.
Strauss turned to the personnel security system in order to destroy Oppenheimer's effectiveness,The mechanism of the grudge: a security process used deliberately to neutralize a rival.
Questions about this scene
Who is David Hill and why is he testifying?
He is a scientist asked to testify about Lewis Strauss, and he speaks about how Strauss treated Oppenheimer rather than about security itself.
What reason does Hill give for the case against Oppenheimer?
He says it was driven by the animus of Lewis Strauss, who never forgave Oppenheimer for publicly humiliating him, and who used the security system to destroy his influence.
What did Oppenheimer do to Strauss?
Oppenheimer made mincemeat out of Strauss's position on shipping isotopes to Norway, and Strauss never forgave the public humiliation.
What does Hill say a board should not do?
He says no board in the country should sit in judgment of a man merely because he expressed strong opinions, and offers himself to be tried instead.
What does "sit in judgment of" mean here?
It means to put someone on trial and judge them; Hill argues that a board should not judge a man for his opinions.
Oppenheimer · 28 chapters
All chapters →
Up next · Chapter 27Haven't the slightest ideaKitty Testifies Before the Board
Chapter 1leaves a little to be desiredBohr Sends Oppenheimer to Göttingen
Chapter 2the man for the jobStrauss Offers Oppenheimer a Job
Chapter 3seek outRabi Meets Oppenheimer on a Train
Chapter 4a vicious cycleOppenheimer Starts His Quantum Seminar
Chapter 5wiggle roomPolitical Debate at a Party
Chapter 6wring your neckOppenheimer Names Los Alamos
Chapter 7from moneyOppenheimer Explains Empty Space
Chapter 8herd intoLawrence Shuts Down the Union
Chapter 9point takenGroves Offers Oppenheimer the Job
Chapter 10a point of no returnOppenheimer Asks Einstein About Doomsday
Chapter 11pass onChevalier Suggests Passing Secrets
Chapter 12the business at handTeller Pitches the H-Bomb
Chapter 13Thanks for nothingCondon Quits Los Alamos
Chapter 14drop in and outOppenheimer's Last Night With Jean
Chapter 15a cock-and-bull storyOppenheimer's Cock-and-Bull Story
Chapter 16took a wrong turnBohr Warns of the Aftermath
Chapter 17go down this roadThe GAC Debates the H-Bomb
Chapter 18a lot of latitudeThe Target Committee Debates the Bomb
Chapter 19gallows humorWaiting Out the Storm at Trinity
Chapter 20blood on my handsOppenheimer Meets President Truman
Chapter 21A man of convictionThe Fuchs Spy Case Comes Up
Chapter 22curse the name ofOppenheimer Refuses the Super Bomb
Chapter 23how the game is playedPlanning Oppenheimer's Downfall
Chapter 24MermaidsRabi Defends Oppenheimer
Chapter 25cuts both waysBorden Reads the Accusation Letter
Watching · Chapter 26made mincemeat out ofHill Blames Strauss at the Hearing
Chapter 27Haven't the slightest ideaKitty Testifies Before the Board
Chapter 28moral scruplesOppenheimer Is Cross-Examined