In fast speech, let the t in 'wait' brush past and slide into 'another'.
I suggest we wait another five minutes, and then choose another lead counsel.Rounders · 1998 — 第 14 / 26 章 · 3'01" · B2
A late courtroom advocate cites the wrong Supreme Court case and gets corrected; afterward, the poker rule he taught — 'Throw in your cards the moment you know they can't win' — is turned against him in a breakup.
In a courtroom session, the lead counsel arrives late, fumbles the opening, and cites a free-speech case that has no bearing on the issue. Someone else takes over and delivers the argument. After court, a tense exchange turns the poker rule about folding a losing hand into a verdict on a relationship.
注目の表現
lead counseloral argumentsno bearingtake over
このシーンの表現
fold; quit a losing hand
After the hearing, a line says 'I learned it from you, Mike,' then turns to the poker rule: throw in your cards as a way to explain leaving; the tone is calm, as if reciting a rule once taught.
Sometimes the smart move is to throw in your cards early.
head lawyer for a case
spoken arguments in court
have no connection to; not affect
take control
make something seem as if it were true
42 行のセリフに 23 件のメモ
In fast speech, let the t in 'wait' brush past and slide into 'another'.
I suggest we wait another five minutes, and then choose another lead counsel.Put the weight on 'so sorry' and let the apology stretch a little.
I'm so sorry I'm late.court is now in session
Come to order in the matter of Slater v. New York State Higher Education Services.have been formally agreed
The facts have been stipulated, the briefs have been read.go ahead with
please proceed with oral arguments now.the issue before the court bar here means the court, not a drinking place
the case which controls the issue at bar would be, uh, Texas v. Johnson, - Which holds... - Texas v. Johnson?relative clause: The relative clause narrows 'the case' to the one controlling the issue before the court.
the case which controls the issue at bar would be, uh, Texas v. Johnson, - Which holds... - Texas v. Johnson?segregation in practice de facto means in reality, not necessarily by law
and focus instead on the idea of de facto segregation.turn attention to instead
and focus instead on the idea of de facto segregation.if the court allows
Mr. McDermott has been unreachable, so I'll take over, if it pleases the court.satisfy someone very much
Someone saying something meaningful would please us a great deal.participle phrase: The participle phrase 'saying something meaningful' modifies 'Someone'; the whole noun phrase is the subject.
Someone saying something meaningful would please us a great deal.a clear instance of
What we have here is a clear case of gerrymandering, impacting schoolchildren and schools in the district...all students at a school not a physical body, but the whole student population
Although not dispositive, the student body is more than 99 percent white.reduced concession: The reduced clause concedes one legal point before the racial makeup is emphasized.
Although not dispositive, the student body is more than 99 percent white.first speech to a court
Usually you have to know something about a case to give an opening statement.turn out well for someone
Hey, it worked out great for me, McDermott. I think I actually impressed Marinacci.Let the t in 'pretty' tap lightly; don't clip both syllables.
We're not gonna talk? You left me pretty quick there.going to (spoken) — Common in speech; avoid it in formal writing.
We're not gonna talk? You left me pretty quick there.make something seem as if it were true
After court, the two rehash the breakup; 'make it sound as if' pushes back on a version of events in which the decision was the speaker's.
- You make it sound as if it was my decision. - Well, it wasn't mine.fold; quit the hand — Poker jargon; it can also metaphorically mean backing out.
- Fold the hand. - Look, this is our thing that we're talking about.the end of something
So, that's the last of it, then?luck isn't the point
I mean, I'd say good luck, but I know it's not about luck in your game.The courtroom failure is not just lateness. Mike starts with 'Texas v. Johnson', and the reply is blunt: it is a free-speech case that 'has no bearing in the premises.' When someone offers to take over, the answer is dry: 'Someone saying something meaningful would please us a great deal.' Then the scene moves from court to a breakup, and the poker language arrives. 'I learned it from you, Mike. You always told me that this was the rule.' The rule is 'Throw in your cards the moment you know they can't win.' The reply, 'It's not some losing hand of poker,' tries to keep cards and relationship apart, but the dialogue shows how easily the language of folding spreads from the table to people.
Someone saying something meaningful would please us a great deal.A dry courtroom rebuke: after weak arguments, the speaker says the court would be pleased by someone saying something meaningful.
Usually you have to know something about a case to give an opening statement.Sarcastic criticism: the opening was so uninformed that it implies the person giving it skipped the basic preparation.
I learned it from you, Mike.The line turns the breakup back on Mike: the habit of walking away was taught by him.
Rule number one: Throw in your cards the moment you know they can't win.The poker rule is invoked as a life rule: once a situation is clearly lost, cut your losses and leave.
I mean, I'd say good luck, but I know it's not about luck in your game.A parting shot that mixes farewell with the claim that his game is not about luck.
Because the dialogue identifies it as a Supreme Court free-speech case and says it 'has no bearing in the premises.' A following line says each group was told to ignore that aspect and focus instead on de facto segregation.
The line says Mr. McDermott has been unreachable and asks to take over 'if it pleases the court.' The next line replies that someone saying something meaningful 'would please us a great deal.'
It means folding a losing hand. In the breakup, it becomes the rule for leaving once a situation cannot win; the reply insists it is 'not some losing hand of poker.'
It follows an opening that clearly went badly. The line implies the opening statement was given without knowing the case, which is why it lands as a rebuke.
次のチャプター · 第 15 章run someone upPetra Visits Mike About Worm's Debt
第 1 章make a run at itBuying Into Teddy KGB's Game
第 2 章represent that you have somethingPoker Night With the Judges
第 3 章read his hand blindReading a Hand Starts a Fight
第 4 章get cleaned outMike Picks Up an Old Friend
第 5 章crack the gameMike and Worm Fleece a Private Game
第 6 章cut this room upMike and Worm at the Card Game
第 7 章shear a sheepSlow Roll at the Russian Game
第 8 章the juice is still runnin'Grama Threatens Worm
第 9 章tight, but aggressiveMichael and the Professor Discuss Poker
第 10 章can't run from who we areThe Prodigy Who Left the Yeshiva
第 11 章the rakeMike Gets Dumped Outside
第 12 章tellsMike Returns to the Card Room
第 13 章juiceA Friend's Debt Comes Due
再生中 · 第 14 章throw in your cardsMike Fumbles Oral Arguments
第 15 章run someone upPetra Visits Mike About Worm's Debt
第 16 章in hockMike Finds Worm at the Gym
第 17 章good for itMike Vouches for Worm
第 18 章wait someone outCigar Talk at the Poker Table
第 19 章total fishPitching the Binghamton Game
第 20 章let the cards do the talkingMike Joins the Police Poker Game
第 21 章get outta DodgeTwo Men Argue Over Skipping Town
第 22 章go into hockKnish Refuses to Lend Mike Money
第 23 章put it all on the lineThe Johnny Chan Story
第 24 章vouch forMichael Asks for a $15,000 Loan
第 25 章let it rideHeads-Up With KGB
第 26 章alligator bloodA Poker Player Doubles the Blind