All the President's Men · 1976 — 第 3 / 18 章 · 3'32" · B2

Who Gets the Watergate Story, Explained:bust one's ass

Rosenfeld and Simons are deciding who should run with the Watergate break-in, and the real argument is about hunger. "Howard, they're hungry," one editor says, defending two young reporters nobody trusts yet. The scene ends with those same reporters fighting over a single paragraph.

あらすじ

In the Washington Post newsroom, editors debate whether Woodward and Bernstein deserve to keep the Watergate break-in story. One calls Woodward green but relentless; another remembers threatening to fire Bernstein. Once the assignment is settled, the two reporters collide over a draft, each rewriting the other's copy without asking.

Office chatArgumentsPersuadingConfrontingCoworkersB2fastamerican
IMDb ↗

注目の表現

all over the mapbust one's assbullshitwhat's that got to do with

00:00 / 03:32
Space 再生 · ← → セリフ移動 · R リピート
いま
セリフをタップするとそこから再生

このシーンの表現

bust one's ass

work extremely hard

Someone defends the newcomer, saying he has busted his ass for the paper.

She busted her ass to get the report in on time.

このシーンの他の表現

  • all over the map

    scattered and disorganized

  • bullshit

    nonsense, crap

  • what's that got to do with

    how is that relevant

  • now that

    given that, since

  • give something a glance

    take a quick look

このシーンのメモ一覧

60 行のセリフに 29 件のメモ

表現 · B1be all over the map

scattered and disorganized

Someone complains the reporters are chasing the primaries, and the editor says they are all over the map.

They're all over the map covering the primaries.
表現 · B1work on a paper

employed at a newspaper

- Besides, this guy has busted his ass. - He's been on this paper for nine months.
発音busted his ass

Link busted his into busted-is, keeping his light.

- Besides, this guy has busted his ass. - He's been on this paper for nine months.
スラング · B2busted his ass

worked his guts out — Fine between coworkers venting, not in formal talk.

- Besides, this guy has busted his ass. - He's been on this paper for nine months.
スラング · B2humper

a hard grafter — Newsroom slang, often a little mocking.

- What's the matter with you? - He's a humper.
スラング · C1rat shit

junk trivia — Crude slang for worthless little matters.

What's he been writing about, rat shit in restaurants?
表現 · B2get something closed

get pieces finished and published

- He's got no experience. - He got a few closed.
表現 · B1now that ...

given that, since

The editor says that now the story has been built up, Moffitt will surely want it.

Sure, Moffitt will want the story now that we've built it into something.
表現 · B2build something into something

turn it into something bigger

Sure, Moffitt will want the story now that we've built it into something.
スラング · C1cockamamie

ridiculous, half-baked — Dismissive slang for a silly idea or scheme.

I read that cockamamie memorandum he wrote on the break-in.
表現 · A2fire someone

dismiss someone

You told me yourself you were gonna fire him last month.
表現 · B2want on a story bad

is desperate to join the story here bad means very much

Look, he wants on the story bad. They both do.
表現 · B1be hungry

eager and ambitious here hungry means eager for a chance

Howard, they're hungry. You remember when you were hungry?
スラング · A2gotta

have got to — Spoken contraction; avoid it in writing.

I gotta have a cigarette.
表現 · A2be in (the office)

be at the office

WOMAN 1: Yeah, he'll be in in about half an hour. Can I have him call you?
発音be in in about

The two in's blur into in-in before about.

WOMAN 1: Yeah, he'll be in in about half an hour. Can I have him call you?
表現 · A2who's calling

who is on the line

On a newsroom call, the person answering asks politely who is calling.

Yes, I will. Can you tell me who's calling?
表現 · B1comment about something

a remark on something

Listen, I want his comment about that appointment.
表現 · B1be a little fuzzy

a bit unclear

I'm just helping. It's a little fuzzy.
表現 · B1say what you mean

express it clearly

- I don't think you're saying what you mean. - I know exactly what I mean.
文法 · B2I don't think you're saying

negation raising: The not belongs logically to the following clause, softening a direct criticism.

- I don't think you're saying what you mean. - I know exactly what I mean.
文法 · B2whether Hunt works for Colson or Colson for Hunt

whether...or clause: The whether...or clause lays out two possibilities as the object of tell.

I can't tell whether Hunt works for Colson or Colson for Hunt.
表現 · B1look for a fight

spoiling for an argument

The two reporters trade barbs over the draft, and one insists he is not looking for a fight.

- I'm not looking for a fight. - I'm not either.
表現 · B1have got to do with something

be connected to something

What's that got to do with anything?
発音got to do

Reduce got to into gotta and run straight into do.

What's that got to do with anything?
表現 · B2be in the business

work in this field

- Been in the business since I'm 16. - What are you saying?
文法 · B2Been in the business since

ellipsis with perfect tense: The subject and have are dropped, so Been stands for I've been.

- Been in the business since I'm 16. - What are you saying?
表現 · B1give something a glance

take a quick look

Woodward says he gave the other reporter's draft a glance and then started rewriting it.

I gave yours a glance, it didn't look right, so I figured I'd refine it a little.
表現 · B2put something up front

near the top here it means near the top of the story

I've got Colson's name up front.

「Who Gets the Watergate Story」を読み解く

What's really going on

The newsroom runs on a simple currency: hunger. Woodward has been at the paper nine months and still gets dismissed as a "humper," so his defenders argue in the only language that matters to an editor. "Howard, they're hungry. You remember when you were hungry?" That line is the whole scene. Rosenfeld is not praising talent; he is saying appetite beats experience, because nobody else wants this story yet. The break-in looks like a minor burglary, and a hungry reporter will chase what a comfortable one won't. Minutes later the same hunger turns on itself: two ambitious reporters can't share one byline, so they rewrite each other's paragraphs and trade lines like "I'm not looking for a fight." The paper's future depends on these two, even as they can barely work together.

Theme

AmbitionTwo young reporters want the Watergate story badly; editors judge them by appetite, not seniority.
PowerA handful of editors decide who gets to investigate the White House, and the choice is made in one hallway conversation.

このチャプターで学べること

  • All over the map adds a note of no clear plan.
  • Give something a glance means a quick, casual look.
  • The counter-question dodges an irrelevant attack.
  • Now that ties a result to a change of situation.

発音のポイント

  • busted his ass — Link busted his into busted-is, keeping his light.
  • be in in about — The two in's blur into in-in before about.
  • got to do — Reduce got to into gotta and run straight into do.
What's that got to do with anything?

A blunt challenge: the other reporter cites nine months at the paper, and this asks why that fact matters at all.

I gave yours a glance, it didn't look right, so I figured I'd refine it a little.

He admits he barely read the other version and decided on his own to improve it, which is exactly why the other reporter is angry.

- Been in the business since I'm 16. - What are you saying?

One reporter leans on sixteen years of experience; the other cuts in, hearing a status claim rather than a point about the story.

Howard, they're hungry. You remember when you were hungry?

The editor's case for the two young reporters: raw appetite, not credentials, is what this story needs right now.

このシーンについての質問

Why do the editors give the Watergate story to Woodward and Bernstein?

Nobody more senior wants it. The break-in looks like a minor burglary, so the only reporters pushing for it are the two young, hungry ones the editors half-trust.

Who is the "humper" the editors are arguing about?

Woodward. The word mocks him as a grinder who chases small stories hard, which is also the reason he gets the assignment.

Why is Bernstein reading Woodward's copy?

He thinks it's fuzzy and rewrites it without being asked. Woodward objects, then admits Bernstein was right about putting Colson's name up front.

Does Woodward really want the story that badly?

Yes. "He wants on the story bad," an editor says, and the hunger argument is what settles the decision in their favor.

大統領の陰謀 · 全 18 章

すべて見る →
第 3 / 18 章 · 残り約 52 分