directly and plainly
No, we were never told flat-out, "Don't talk."All the President's Men · 1976 — 第 13 / 18 章 · 3'34" · C1
A treasurer lays out the shape of the case: five men controlled the money, and he names three while hinting at two more. The surface is an interview about procedure; underneath, the reporters are one unnamed source away from accusing the former attorney general. "Everything's cleared with the White House," he explains.
Woodward and Bernstein interview Hugh Sloan, the committee treasurer, about how the money moved. He says there were five men controlling the slush fund: Mitchell, Stans and Magruder are obvious, and he hints that the White House overseer was Haldeman and that Nixon's own lawyer Kalmbach was involved. Back at the paper, Bradlee warns them not to name anyone until they are certain, then Bernstein calls John Mitchell for comment.
注目の表現
goddamn ithave an axslush fundcome forward
このシーンの表現
a secret fund for shady payments
The reporter sums up that five men controlled the secret fund, framing the whole investigation.
The campaign was funded by a secret slush fund.
damn it (frustration)
have a grudge to settle
step up and speak out
an attempt to hide wrongdoing
speak openly, with your name attached
69 行のセリフに 26 件のメモ
directly and plainly
No, we were never told flat-out, "Don't talk."the point came through
But the message was clear, though.put another way
In other words, by their very silence, there was a cover-up.step up and speak out
Sloan says no one urged them to come forward, which quietly implies pressure to stay quiet.
They didn't urge us to come forward and tell the truth.get approval from literally cleared; here approved by
Everything's cleared with the White House.object clause: The clause is the object of think, and the negation really applies to the clause.
And I don't think that the FBI or the prosecutors understand that.Keep 'was' weak so 'What was it' runs together.
...in the CREEP safe, that... What was it?... $350,000, is that a...?nearer to
No, it was closer to 1 million.there must have been
Well, there had to be a White House overseer.too-to construction: The too-to pattern carries a hidden negative: too smart to get involved means he will not.
No, Colson's too smart to get involved directly with anything like that.refuse to discuss
I won't talk about the other two.that is all I will reveal
The other one's not in Washington, but that's all I'll say.in business rather than government
I've been looking for a job in the private sector, but it's...distribute
When you handed out the money, how did that work exactly?what was the process
I think what Bob means is, ordinarily, what was the procedure?Link 'Go ahead' so the vowel glides across.
- He'd say, "Go ahead, give out the money." CARL: This was all done verbally?a secret fund for shady payments
The reporter sums up that five men controlled the secret fund, framing the whole investigation.
We know there were five men who controlled the slush fund.right? (checking) — A casual tag; keep it out of formal talk.
Maybe you'd better wait till we get all five, huh?time clause: The while-clause pins the approval to his time in office.
We know he approved payments to Liddy while he was attorney general.have a grudge to settle
The reporter asks whether any source has a grudge against Mitchell, to check their motive.
Do any of them have an ax? - Nope.no (casual) — Casual no; not for formal answers.
Do any of them have an ax? - Nope.speak openly, with your name attached
The reporter complains that the whole story rests on unnamed sources and no one will speak openly.
When is somebody gonna go on the record in this story?going to (casual) — Very casual; avoid it in writing.
When is somebody gonna go on the record in this story?on the verge of doing
You are about to write a story that says the former attorney general...make certain you are correct
Just be sure you're right.Link 'at this' and keep the h in 'hour' soft.
...and I'm sorry to disturb you at this hour.The interview works because Sloan talks around the truth instead of lying. He will not say the committee was directed, but he does not have to: "Everything's cleared with the White House," he explains, which is the whole case in one line. His hesitations are precise, and he gives the reporters a structure, five men and one fund, without naming the last two outright. Bradlee's reaction is the other half of the scene. He refuses to let the paper go first: "When is somebody gonna go on the record in this story?" The story's biggest problem is not evidence but attribution, and the call to Mitchell at the end is an attempt to change that. Bernstein is polite on the phone, but the purpose is clear: give the target a chance to deny before the story runs.
In other words, by their very silence, there was a cover-up.Sloan's point: nobody had to issue an order to stay quiet, because the silence itself protected the people involved.
When is somebody gonna go on the record in this story?The editor's frustration: every source is anonymous, so the paper still cannot print names even when it knows them.
No, Colson's too smart to get involved directly with anything like that.A source rejects one suspect because he would never leave a direct trail, which narrows the search to someone else.
It's very hard. My name's been in the papers too much.Sloan explains why leaving the committee is hard: publicity has made him hard to hire in private business.
Everything's cleared with the White House.The single line that links the campaign committee to the White House, delivered as a matter of routine rather than a confession.
Mitchell, Stans, Magruder, Haldeman and Kalmbach, according to Sloan. The reporters can name three; the last two come as hints that still need confirmation.
Because the story would accuse the former attorney general, the country's top law-enforcement officer. He wants every name backed by more than one source before it runs.
He says he cannot and apologizes, which suggests he still fears the people he is pointing at even as he helps the reporters.
He is calling John Mitchell to ask for comment, giving the story's main target a chance to respond before the Post prints anything.
次のチャプター · 第 14 章non-denial denialsThe Non-Denial Denial
第 1 章work the phonesPolice Arrest the Watergate Burglars
第 2 章under adjudicationWoodward Traces the White House Call
第 3 章bust one's assWho Gets the Watergate Story
第 4 章get to someoneLibrarian Recants to Woodward
第 5 章follow the moneyDeep Throat Says Follow the Money
第 6 章get to someone beforeWoodward Finds the Dahlberg Check
第 7 章caught in the middleThe Donor Confesses to Bernstein
第 8 章monopoly on wisdomBradlee Doubts the Watergate Story
第 9 章cover-upReporters Question the Frightened Clerk
第 10 章bury the reportNixon Renominated, Report Buried
第 11 章fall guyThe Bookkeeper Talks About the Money
第 12 章fake someone outReporters Decode the Matchbook Initials
再生中 · 第 13 章slush fundFive Men Controlled the Slush Fund
第 14 章non-denial denialsThe Non-Denial Denial
第 15 章double-crossDeep Throat: Look at the Overall
第 16 章non-denial denialClawson Denies the Canuck Letter
第 17 章fair gameWoodward and Bernstein Name Haldeman
第 18 章shabby journalismWhite House Attacks the Post