really do recall
I do remember getting material for somebody, but it wasn't Mr. Hunt.All the President's Men · 1976 — 第 4 / 18 章 · 3'40" · B1
A White House librarian tells Bernstein that Howard Hunt took out books on Ted Kennedy, then swears she never knew Hunt. "Between the first and second quote, there's a contradiction." Woodward presses the White House for comment and gets a flat denial: the conversation never happened.
At the Washington Post, Bernstein phones a White House librarian while chasing a Howard Hunt lead. She first says Hunt borrowed books on Senator Edward Kennedy, then denies knowing him at all. Woodward calls Ken Clawson at the White House Communications Office. Clawson returns the call to say the librarian denies the entire conversation ever took place.
注目の表現
get to someoneget something on paperbullshitthe truth is
このシーンの表現
pressure or bribe someone
The librarian flips her story, and Bernstein concludes that someone got to her.
Someone is trying to get to the witness before the trial.
put it in writing
nonsense, crap
in fact, honestly
what did you say
send someone to
68 行のセリフに 24 件のメモ
really do recall
I do remember getting material for somebody, but it wasn't Mr. Hunt.Run wondering if any together as one smooth phrase.
Uh, I was just wondering if any... If you have any...looking into it now
Yes, we're checking into that information now.discover the facts
We'd just like to find out just what it was that Hunt did...finish a call
Just got off the phone with the librarian. You wanna look at the notes on it?want to — Spoken contraction; avoid in writing.
Just got off the phone with the librarian. You wanna look at the notes on it?tied to something
...that Hunt was connected with.There's a blurs into there-za, with a almost gone.
Between the first and second quote, there's a contradiction.a gap of some seconds
It's a space of about five seconds.Link denied even into deny-deven without a pause.
Then she denied even knowing who he was.give a remark about it
I was wondering if you'd like to comment on this confusion.follow it up
- I'm gonna check on it for you. - Fine, thank you. Bye.pressure or bribe someone
The librarian flips her story, and Bernstein concludes that someone got to her.
- It's obvious someone got to her. - Not enough proof.relative clause: The that-clause describes the paper, narrowing it to the one with those words on it.
If there was a piece of paper that said Hunt was taking out books...borrow books
Hunt took out books from the Library of Congress...more to the point
...but what's more important is somebody got to her in...subject clause: The what-clause is the subject; is introduces the real point that follows.
...but what's more important is somebody got to her in...happened
She denies that the conversation with Mr. Bernstein ever took place.deny + gerund: Deny takes the -ing form: she denies knowing him, not denies to know him.
You say she denies even knowing about the conversation taking place?send someone to
...but all she did was refer him to the Press Office.nonsense — A vulgar word; only among close colleagues.
- She denies other conversation took place. - Total bullshit.put it in writing
After the two conflicting calls, the reporters agree they need to get something on paper.
- We've gotta get something on paper. - Library of Congress.have got to — Spoken contraction; not for formal use.
- We've gotta get something on paper. - Library of Congress.asked for by someone
You want all the material requested by the White House?The librarian's five-second flip is the whole scene. She doesn't just contradict herself; she reverses from naming Hunt to not knowing him, which Bernstein reads as a warning being delivered. "It's obvious someone got to her," he says. Woodward's answer, "Not enough proof," is the reporter's instinct: a hunch about intimidation is worthless until it is documented. That's why their next thought is to get it on paper. When Woodward confronts Clawson with the contradiction, Clawson doesn't defend the facts, he denies the event, then hangs up with a polite "I hope that's been of some help to you." The White House isn't arguing the content; it's erasing the phone call itself. This is where Watergate reporting turns personal: sources start recanting, and the story becomes proving what everyone now denies.
- It's obvious someone got to her. - Not enough proof.Bernstein is sure someone pressured or bought off the librarian. Woodward answers that a hunch isn't proof; without documents, the suspicion can't be printed.
- We've gotta get something on paper. - Library of Congress.They need written documentation, not just a source's word. The Library of Congress keeps borrowing records, so a library slip could prove Hunt took out the books.
Between the first and second quote, there's a contradiction.The librarian's two statements can't both be true: Hunt borrowed the books, and she never knew Hunt. Five seconds apart, the story flips.
Five seconds later, she says, "I don't know Mr. Hunt."Bernstein replays the tape for Woodward, showing how fast the librarian reversed herself. The abrupt denial is what makes the reporters suspect she was warned.
She first admits Howard Hunt borrowed books on Ted Kennedy, then denies knowing him. The reporters assume she was contacted and pressured between those two statements, though they can't prove who did it.
It's an idiom meaning someone reached a person privately and pressured, threatened or paid them into changing their behavior. Bernstein uses it to explain why the librarian suddenly recanted.
Instead of defending what the librarian said, the White House denies the call took place. Erasing the conversation avoids leaving a statement on record that the Post could quote back at them.
She told Bernstein one thing and the White House another. Either she was pressured after their call, or she was protecting herself. The film leaves it ambiguous, which is exactly the point.
A White House communications aide Woodward calls for comment on the librarian's contradiction. His polite callback, offering to "check on it," is the White House closing ranks rather than answering the question.
次のチャプター · 第 5 章follow the moneyDeep Throat Says Follow the Money
第 1 章work the phonesPolice Arrest the Watergate Burglars
第 2 章under adjudicationWoodward Traces the White House Call
第 3 章bust one's assWho Gets the Watergate Story
再生中 · 第 4 章get to someoneLibrarian Recants to Woodward
第 5 章follow the moneyDeep Throat Says Follow the Money
第 6 章get to someone beforeWoodward Finds the Dahlberg Check
第 7 章caught in the middleThe Donor Confesses to Bernstein
第 8 章monopoly on wisdomBradlee Doubts the Watergate Story
第 9 章cover-upReporters Question the Frightened Clerk
第 10 章bury the reportNixon Renominated, Report Buried
第 11 章fall guyThe Bookkeeper Talks About the Money
第 12 章fake someone outReporters Decode the Matchbook Initials
第 13 章slush fundFive Men Controlled the Slush Fund
第 14 章non-denial denialsThe Non-Denial Denial
第 15 章double-crossDeep Throat: Look at the Overall
第 16 章non-denial denialClawson Denies the Canuck Letter
第 17 章fair gameWoodward and Bernstein Name Haldeman
第 18 章shabby journalismWhite House Attacks the Post