share one switch
Must have been on the same switch with the lights.12 Angry Men · 1957 — 第 13 / 17 章 · 5'03" · B2
The jury is deadlocked and someone wants to declare a hung jury, but the argument isn't over. A juror re-examines the boy's only alibi — that he was at the movies — and then turns the same test on the room: asked what they saw on Monday night, a juror can only recall the first film, not the second.
The jury seems stuck, and one juror moves to declare a hung jury and go home. Instead, the conversation returns to the boy's alibi: he said he was at the movies but couldn't name the films or the stars. A juror pushes the same question at the room, asking what someone else saw at the movies — and they cannot remember the second feature either.
注目の表現
Even Stevenhung juryreasonable doubtfind out
このシーンの表現
a jury that cannot agree
An impatient juror offers to declare the jury deadlocked and end the case right away.
The trial ended in a hung jury after two days of debate.
all square, even
doubt a fair mind could hold
discover, learn
the sole alibi
have a chance of success
97 行のセリフに 23 件のメモ
share one switch
Must have been on the same switch with the lights.improve, get better
Well, things are looking up here, huh?To the is often reduced to a quick ta-tha in speech.
Any of you guys ever go to the Garden?bloody, damn — Mild swearing; keep it out of formal talk.
That's a damn stupid thing to do.all square, even
A juror jokes that the two sides are now all square, lightening the tense room.
Well, how do you like it? Even Steven.provoke someone
was trying to bait me - That doesn't prove anything.get nowhere
I'll tell you what I think. We're going nowhere here.a jury that cannot agree
An impatient juror offers to declare the jury deadlocked and end the case right away.
I'm ready to walk into court right now and declare a hung jury.present perfect: The present perfect stresses that the time spent in the room is still running.
I don't think the judge will accept a hung jury. We haven't been in here very long.going to — Spoken shorthand; too casual for writing.
Come on! We're hung. Nobody's gonna change his vote. Let's take it inside.doubt a fair mind could hold
Juror Eight presses the other man on whether there is still no room for reasonable doubt.
You still don't think there's room for reasonable doubt?Link there's and room so it sounds like one word.
You still don't think there's room for reasonable doubt?how do you — An irritated spoken question; fine among friends.
Boy, how do ya like this guy?telling you — Casual speech only; never write it this way.
I'm tellin' ya, they're all alike.be in charge
they're telling us how to run the show, huh?the sole alibi
Juror Eight notes this was the only alibi the boy had, and he could not support it with details.
It was the only alibi the boy offered...Only and alibi run together; stress the first syllable of alibi.
It was the only alibi the boy offered...participle clause: The opening participle sets up a hypothetical: if you were the boy.
Putting yourself in the boy's place, do you think you could remember details...go to great trouble
Yes. His lawyer took great pains to bring that out.preposition plus which: In which to memorize links the three months to the purpose of memorizing.
in which to memorize them.discover, learn
Juror Eight argues a lawyer could easily find out what played at a theater on a given night.
It's not difficult for a lawyer to find out what played at a particular theater...immediately after
I'll take the testimony of the policemen who interrogated the boy right after the murder...the second film in a double bill
It was a very inexpensive second feature with, uh, unknown...The scene quietly turns the prosecution's strongest 'fact' back on the jury. The boy's failure to remember movie titles was used to prove he wasn't at the theater; but remembering a film you saw weeks ago is not easy. A juror tests this by asking someone else, "Where were you last night?" and then walking him through the nights until he names a film — The Scarlet Circle — and comes up short on the second feature. That admission does what argument could not: it shows the boy's memory problem is ordinary, not incriminating. The reenactment of the alibi runs the other way too: a lawyer could easily find out what played, so the boy could have memorized the titles in three months. Either way, the jury is now testing stories against their own experience rather than taking them on faith.
I'll tell you what I think. We're going nowhere here.A juror's verdict on the deliberation: no one is changing, so continuing to talk is pointless. It's the push to declare a hung jury and quit.
Listen. This kid wouldn't stand a chance with another jury, and you know it.The warning behind staying: if this jury hangs, a retrial is likely to convict. Better to decide now than hand the boy to a harsher room.
You still don't think there's room for reasonable doubt?The holdout's challenge to a juror who insists the case is closed: even after all this, is there truly no space for doubt?
Maybe you don't fully understand the term "reasonable doubt."A jab that turns the juror's certainty into ignorance — the one who is sure may simply not grasp what the law demands.
To attack the boy's alibi with the jury's own memory. The prosecution said the boy must have lied because he couldn't name the films; the juror shows that anyone can forget a movie they saw.
It was the only explanation he offered for where he was when his father was killed. If his memory lapse is normal rather than proof of guilt, the case against him weakens.
A jury that cannot agree on a verdict, which can lead to a retrial. One juror wants to declare a hung jury and end the deliberation, but others resist.
Because it was an inexpensive, forgettable second film with unknown actors — exactly the kind of detail no one would remember weeks later. That is the point he is making about the boy.
The prosecution suggested he could have learned them in the three months between the murder and the trial, which is why the defense's timing argument matters so much to the jury.
次のチャプター · 第 14 章have the gutsJuror 8's Knife Demonstration
第 1 章open-and-shut caseJurors Gather in the Jury Room
第 2 章kick someone aroundJuror 8 Votes Not Guilty
第 3 章burden of proofThe Jurors Go Around the Table
第 4 章breaking pointJuror 5 Stands Up to a Bigot
第 5 章alleged eyewitnessJuror 8 Shows a Second Switchblade
第 6 章hang a juryJuror 8 Proposes Another Vote
第 7 章run it up the flagpoleJuror 9 Switches His Vote
第 8 章as plain as the nose on your faceJuror 8 Tests the El Train Timing
第 9 章recede into the backgroundWhy the Old Man Would Lie
第 10 章off the top of my headJuror 8 Questions the Knife
第 11 章out of thin airJuror 8 Reenacts the Old Man's Walk
第 12 章see if the cat licks it upThe Jury Deadlocks at Six to Six
再生中 · 第 13 章hung juryJuror 8 Tests the Movie Alibi
第 14 章have the gutsJuror 8's Knife Demonstration
第 15 章you peopleJuror 10's Racist Rant
第 16 章obscure the truthJuror 8 Warns About Prejudice
第 17 章in questionJuror 8 Doubts the Eyewitness