didn't I bring that up?
But didn't I mention the ongoing "wow" is happening right now?Waking Life · 2001 — 第 12 / 13 章 · 2'32" · C1
A voice on a bridge turns a poem about dreams into a case for living now, then builds to the claim that "we are the authors of ourselves." The tension is between understanding life and actually living it—and whether that paradox can be danced with rather than solved.
On a bridge, a monologue moves from the warning that life is not a dream to the idea that "now" is happening. It calls everyone coauthors of a dancing exuberance, says life is a miracle collected over time, and ends with self-awareness as realizing one is a dream figure in someone else's dream.
注目の表現
coauthors ofhaving a roasthow exciting alienation can bea matter of
このシーンの表現
joint authors of something
Someone calls everyone joint authors of a dancing exuberance, making co-creation sound excited and slightly absurd.
The two directors are coauthors of a strange, luminous film.
holding or getting a roast
how thrilling alienation can be
essentially a question of
would prefer to take part in life
hit and knock down
35 行のセリフに 28 件のメモ
didn't I bring that up?
But didn't I mention the ongoing "wow" is happening right now?In fast speech, 'didn't I' often blurs; keep the t light and slide into 'mention'.
But didn't I mention the ongoing "wow" is happening right now?joint authors of something
Someone calls everyone joint authors of a dancing exuberance, making co-creation sound excited and slightly absurd.
We are all coauthors of this dancing exuberance...Keep 'of' weak and put the beat on 'coauthors'.
We are all coauthors of this dancing exuberance...holding or getting a roast
The line personifies our inabilities as if they were holding a roast, so the tone is playful self-mockery rather than a real banquet.
where even our inabilities are having a roast.participial phrase: The -ing phrase expands 'we', and 'starring clowns' modifies the novel.
We are the authors of ourselves, coauthoring a gigantic Dostoyevsky novel starring clowns.connected to or caught up in
This entire thing we're involved with called the world...how thrilling alienation can be
The line casts the world as an exhibition space for showing how exciting alienation can be, a provocative claim delivered with relish rather than complaint.
is an opportunity to exhibit how exciting alienation can be.essentially a question of
The speaker uses 'a matter of' to raise life into a question of miracle, with a tone that is solemn and slightly playful.
Life is a matter of a miracle that is collected over time...gathered gradually
Life is a matter of a miracle that is collected over time...together with one another
by moments flabbergasted to be in each other's presence.look past something
Our eyesight is here as a test to see if we can see beyond it.as a test of something
Matter is here as a test for our curiosity.take part in life
Thomas Mann wrote that he would rather participate in life...hit by a car
Giacometti was once run down by a car,enter a conscious faint
and he recalled falling into a lucid faint,time clause: The 'as' clause sets the moment; after 'realized', 'that' is left out before the next clause.
a sudden exhilaration, as he realized at last something was happening to him.appositive clause: The that-clause spells out what the assumption is; it is not the object of 'develops'.
An assumption develops that you cannot understand life and live life simultaneously.in other words
I do not agree entirely. Which is to say I do not exactly disagree.not quite disagree
I do not agree entirely. Which is to say I do not exactly disagree.Speed up 'which is to' and land on 'say'.
I do not agree entirely. Which is to say I do not exactly disagree.annoy me — Casual; use 'bother me' in formal settings.
But the paradoxes bug me, and I can learn to love and make love...relative clause: The clause identifies which paradoxes: the ones that annoy the speaker.
to the paradoxes that bug me.go out salsa dancing
And on really romantic evenings of self, I go salsa dancing with my confusion.fall asleep gradually
The line sounds like a bedtime reminder: drift off can mean falling asleep or letting attention float away from the scene.
Before you drift off, don't forget.an insane-seeming activity
Because remembering is so much more a psychotic activity than forgetting.people who do not dream
that the iguana will bite those who do not dream.a figure in a dream
that one is a dream figure...The speech keeps turning a warning into a permission slip. It starts with the citation "life is not a dream," but instead of treating that as a call to wake up, it asks whether the ongoing "wow" is happening right now. The key move is the line "I would say that life understood is life lived": understanding is not the opposite of living, it is part of it. Even the joke about salsa dancing with confusion keeps the paradox in motion rather than resolving it. By the end, self-awareness is not a mirror but a role: to realize one is "a dream figure in another person's dream" is to see the dream and keep moving inside it.
We are the authors of ourselves, coauthoring a gigantic Dostoyevsky novel starring clowns.We create ourselves together, and the result is a huge, tragicomic story in which everyone plays a clown.
I would say that life understood is life lived.Understanding life and living it are not opposites; a life examined is still a life being lived.
I do not agree entirely. Which is to say I do not exactly disagree.A deliberately hedged position: neither full agreement nor full disagreement, keeping the paradox open.
Because remembering is so much more a psychotic activity than forgetting.Memory is stranger and more disturbing than forgetting; holding on takes an almost delusional effort.
And on really romantic evenings of self, I go salsa dancing with my confusion.Instead of resolving confusion, the speaker treats it as a partner—an image of living playfully with uncertainty.
It takes the warning as a starting point, then asks whether the ongoing "wow" is happening now; the emphasis is on attending to the present, not escaping it.
No. It says "I do not agree entirely" and then offers "life understood is life lived," so understanding is treated as part of living, not its opposite.
It uses the accident to describe a "lucid faint," a sudden exhilaration at realizing something is happening to him; the focus is on the intensity of direct experience.
It defines self-awareness that way: realizing one is a dream figure in another person's dream, seeing the dream while still inside it.
It returns to the opening poem: the iguana will bite those who do not dream, so not dreaming is presented as a risk rather than a safe option.
次のチャプター · 第 13 章false awakeningsDreamer Describes False Awakenings
第 1 章on an even keelA Ride Full of Sea Metaphors
第 2 章write ourselves offSpeaker Defends Existentialism
第 3 章at the whim ofThe Evolution Lecture
第 4 章collective memoryTwo People Discuss Reincarnation
第 5 章charadeThe Free Will Lecture
第 6 章two sides of the same coinMan Rants About Control
第 7 章in the middle of nowhereGas Station Shooting Story
第 8 章make the best of itLucid Dreaming Tips and Tricks
第 9 章come out of the momentTwo People Debate What Film Captures
第 10 章be an antStrangers Talk About Not Being Ants
第 11 章beside the pointA Character in a Dream
再生中 · 第 12 章coauthors ofBridge Monologue on Dreams
第 13 章false awakeningsDreamer Describes False Awakenings