Waking Life · 2001 — 第 2 / 13 章 · 2'04" · C1

Speaker Defends Existentialism, Explained:write ourselves off

A case for existentialism: not a "philosophy of despair" but a call to make something of yourself. "It's like your life is yours to create," the speaker says — while warning that talk of social construction hands people a new set of excuses.

あらすじ

A single unbroken monologue. The speaker opens by refusing to file existentialism away as "just another French fashion or historical curiosity," then argues that the tradition usually tagged as gloomy actually reads as exuberance — and that framing people as social constructions or "a confluence of forces" only opens "a whole new world of excuses."

MonologuesSpeechesExplainingPersuadingC1fastamericanClean
IMDb ↗

注目の表現

take responsibility forso much asnagging feelingopen up a whole new world of

00:00 / 02:04
Space 再生 · ← → セリフ移動 · R リピート
いま
  1. ❝ 独白A Defense of Existentialism7 行練習ページ ↗
  2. ❝ 独白Responsibility Made Concrete12 行練習ページ ↗
セリフをタップするとそこから再生

このシーンの表現

write ourselves off

dismiss oneself as hopeless

Near the end, the lecture turns from analysis to advice: do not file yourself away as a victim or a lost cause.

We should never write ourselves off just because one interview went badly.

このシーンの他の表現

  • take responsibility for

    be accountable for

  • so much as

    less A than B

  • nagging feeling

    persistent uneasy feeling

  • open up a whole new world of

    open the door to endless new things

  • concrete

    specific and tangible

このシーンのメモ一覧

30 行のセリフに 28 件のメモ

表現 · B2refuse to take something as something

refuse to treat something as Here it means refusing to treat existentialism as a mere fashion.

The reason why I refuse to take existentialism...
表現 · B2have something to offer someone

have something worth offering

is that I think it has something very important to offer us for the new century.
文法 · B2is that I think it has

predicative clause: The 'is that' introduces the reason itself, not a pause before a new sentence.

is that I think it has something very important to offer us for the new century.
表現 · B2live life passionately

live with passion

I 'm afraid we're losing the real virtues of living life passionately, the sense of taking responsibility for who you are,
表現 · B2take responsibility for something

be accountable for

I 'm afraid we're losing the real virtues of living life passionately, the sense of taking responsibility for who you are,
表現 · B2make something of oneself

make a success of oneself

the ability to make something of yourself and feeling good about life.
表現 · B1feel good about something

feel positive about life

the ability to make something of yourself and feeling good about life.
表現 · B2a philosophy of despair

a philosophy of hopelessness

Existentialism is often discussed as if it's a philosophy of despair.
表現 · B1just the opposite

exactly the reverse

But I think the truth is just the opposite.
スラング · B1these guys

these thinkers — Casual classroom talk; avoid it in formal writing.

But one thing that comes out from reading these guys...
表現 · C1a sense of anguish about something

a feeling of anguish about life

is not a sense of anguish about life so much as...
表現 · C1not so much A as B

less A than B

The speaker acknowledges the familiar image of anguish, then pivots to a more exuberant reading.

is not a sense of anguish about life so much as...
発音not a sense

In fast speech, link 'not a' and keep the t light.

is not a sense of anguish about life so much as...
表現 · C1an exuberance of feeling

a rush of exuberant feeling

a real kind of exuberance of feeling on top of it.
表現 · B2something is yours to create

yours to shape

It's like your life is yours to create.
発音yours to create

Stress 'yours' and 'create'; let 'to' pass quickly.

It's like your life is yours to create.
表現 · B2a nagging feeling

persistent uneasy feeling

The lecturer admits a persistent unease about postmodernist writing, even while granting its appeal.

But when I read them, I always have this awful nagging feeling...
表現 · B2get left out

be omitted

that something absolutely essential is getting left out.
表現 · C1a social construction

a socially constructed idea

The more that you talk about a person as a social construction...
表現 · C1a confluence of forces

a coming-together of forces

or as a confluence of forces...
表現 · C1open up a whole new world of something

a fresh supply of excuses

or as fragmented or marginalized, what you do is you open up a whole new world of excuses.
文法 · B2what you do is you open up

subject clause: The 'what' clause is the subject; 'is' then restates the action and its result.

or as fragmented or marginalized, what you do is you open up a whole new world of excuses.
文法 · B2that theologians would argue about

relative clause: The 'that' clause describes the kind of self or soul under discussion.

He's not talking about the kind of self or soul that theologians would argue about.
発音you and me

The 'and' reduces to a light n; keep the beat on 'you' and 'me'.

It's something very concrete. It's you and me talking.
表現 · B2take the consequences

accept the results

Making decisions. Doing things and taking the consequences.
文法 · B2It might be true that there are

subject clause: The 'it' is a placeholder; the real content comes in the 'that' clause.

It might be true that there are six billion people in the world and counting.
表現 · B2in material terms

in practical or material terms

It makes a difference, first of all, in material terms.
表現 · C1write oneself off

dismiss oneself as hopeless

Near the end, the lecture turns from analysis to advice: do not file yourself away as a victim or a lost cause.

that we should never simply write ourselves off...

「Speaker Defends Existentialism」を読み解く

What's really going on

The surface is a defense of a much-maligned school of philosophy; underneath, it is an argument about excuses. The speaker grants the postmodern critique some admiration — "I've read the post modernists with some interest, even admiration" — then names the cost: "this awful nagging feeling that something absolutely essential is getting left out." Every vocabulary that turns a person into "a social construction" or "a confluence of forces" is, in this reading, also a vocabulary that relocates agency somewhere else. Against that, the scene keeps insisting on the small, unglamorous unit of responsibility: "It's you and me talking. Making decisions. Doing things and taking the consequences." The claim that we should never "write ourselves off" is not consolation; it is a demand, and the scene's confidence comes from how plainly it is stated.

Theme

PhilosophyThe scene argues that existentialism is not despair but exuberance: life is yours to create.
IdentityIt rejects defining a person as a social construction or a victim of forces: who we are is our decision.

発音のポイント

  • not a sense — In fast speech, link 'not a' and keep the t light.
  • yours to create — Stress 'yours' and 'create'; let 'to' pass quickly.
  • you and me — The 'and' reduces to a light n; keep the beat on 'you' and 'me'.
It's like your life is yours to create.

The payoff of the whole argument: nothing upstream settles your life for you; the making of it is handed over to you.

It's always our decision who we are.

Identity is not fixed by social forces or labels; it stays an ongoing choice, made again and again.

Nevertheless, what you do makes a difference.

After conceding six billion people and counting, the speaker still insists that one person's actions land somewhere.

It's something very concrete. It's you and me talking.

Responsibility here is not an abstract doctrine: it is the ordinary exchange in the room, with decisions and consequences attached.

このシーンについての質問

Why does the speaker refuse to treat existentialism as "just another French fashion"?

Because, in this argument, it still "has something very important to offer us for the new century" — the case is made before any definition of the term shows up.

What does the speaker say is missing from postmodernist writing?

Reading them produces "this awful nagging feeling that something absolutely essential is getting left out" — the loss is named, but not spelled out further here.

Why is calling a person a "social construction" a problem in this scene?

The claim is that such descriptions "open up a whole new world of excuses": they move the reason for what someone does away from the person doing it.

Does the scene claim Sartre felt despair?

The reverse is reported: a line relays that Sartre said "he never really felt a day of despair in his life," which is used to argue the philosophy is not one of despair.

How does the scene define responsibility?

Not abstractly and not theologically: "It's you and me talking. Making decisions. Doing things and taking the consequences."

ウェイキング・ライフ · 全 13 章

すべて見る →
第 2 / 13 章 · 残り約 35 分