refuse to treat something as Here it means refusing to treat existentialism as a mere fashion.
The reason why I refuse to take existentialism...Waking Life · 2001 — 第 2 / 13 章 · 2'04" · C1
A case for existentialism: not a "philosophy of despair" but a call to make something of yourself. "It's like your life is yours to create," the speaker says — while warning that talk of social construction hands people a new set of excuses.
A single unbroken monologue. The speaker opens by refusing to file existentialism away as "just another French fashion or historical curiosity," then argues that the tradition usually tagged as gloomy actually reads as exuberance — and that framing people as social constructions or "a confluence of forces" only opens "a whole new world of excuses."
注目の表現
take responsibility forso much asnagging feelingopen up a whole new world of
このシーンの表現
dismiss oneself as hopeless
Near the end, the lecture turns from analysis to advice: do not file yourself away as a victim or a lost cause.
We should never write ourselves off just because one interview went badly.
be accountable for
less A than B
persistent uneasy feeling
open the door to endless new things
specific and tangible
30 行のセリフに 28 件のメモ
refuse to treat something as Here it means refusing to treat existentialism as a mere fashion.
The reason why I refuse to take existentialism...have something worth offering
is that I think it has something very important to offer us for the new century.predicative clause: The 'is that' introduces the reason itself, not a pause before a new sentence.
is that I think it has something very important to offer us for the new century.live with passion
I 'm afraid we're losing the real virtues of living life passionately, the sense of taking responsibility for who you are,be accountable for
I 'm afraid we're losing the real virtues of living life passionately, the sense of taking responsibility for who you are,make a success of oneself
the ability to make something of yourself and feeling good about life.feel positive about life
the ability to make something of yourself and feeling good about life.a philosophy of hopelessness
Existentialism is often discussed as if it's a philosophy of despair.exactly the reverse
But I think the truth is just the opposite.these thinkers — Casual classroom talk; avoid it in formal writing.
But one thing that comes out from reading these guys...a feeling of anguish about life
is not a sense of anguish about life so much as...less A than B
The speaker acknowledges the familiar image of anguish, then pivots to a more exuberant reading.
is not a sense of anguish about life so much as...In fast speech, link 'not a' and keep the t light.
is not a sense of anguish about life so much as...a rush of exuberant feeling
a real kind of exuberance of feeling on top of it.yours to shape
It's like your life is yours to create.Stress 'yours' and 'create'; let 'to' pass quickly.
It's like your life is yours to create.persistent uneasy feeling
The lecturer admits a persistent unease about postmodernist writing, even while granting its appeal.
But when I read them, I always have this awful nagging feeling...be omitted
that something absolutely essential is getting left out.a socially constructed idea
The more that you talk about a person as a social construction...a coming-together of forces
or as a confluence of forces...a fresh supply of excuses
or as fragmented or marginalized, what you do is you open up a whole new world of excuses.subject clause: The 'what' clause is the subject; 'is' then restates the action and its result.
or as fragmented or marginalized, what you do is you open up a whole new world of excuses.relative clause: The 'that' clause describes the kind of self or soul under discussion.
He's not talking about the kind of self or soul that theologians would argue about.The 'and' reduces to a light n; keep the beat on 'you' and 'me'.
It's something very concrete. It's you and me talking.accept the results
Making decisions. Doing things and taking the consequences.subject clause: The 'it' is a placeholder; the real content comes in the 'that' clause.
It might be true that there are six billion people in the world and counting.in practical or material terms
It makes a difference, first of all, in material terms.dismiss oneself as hopeless
Near the end, the lecture turns from analysis to advice: do not file yourself away as a victim or a lost cause.
that we should never simply write ourselves off...The surface is a defense of a much-maligned school of philosophy; underneath, it is an argument about excuses. The speaker grants the postmodern critique some admiration — "I've read the post modernists with some interest, even admiration" — then names the cost: "this awful nagging feeling that something absolutely essential is getting left out." Every vocabulary that turns a person into "a social construction" or "a confluence of forces" is, in this reading, also a vocabulary that relocates agency somewhere else. Against that, the scene keeps insisting on the small, unglamorous unit of responsibility: "It's you and me talking. Making decisions. Doing things and taking the consequences." The claim that we should never "write ourselves off" is not consolation; it is a demand, and the scene's confidence comes from how plainly it is stated.
It's like your life is yours to create.The payoff of the whole argument: nothing upstream settles your life for you; the making of it is handed over to you.
It's always our decision who we are.Identity is not fixed by social forces or labels; it stays an ongoing choice, made again and again.
Nevertheless, what you do makes a difference.After conceding six billion people and counting, the speaker still insists that one person's actions land somewhere.
It's something very concrete. It's you and me talking.Responsibility here is not an abstract doctrine: it is the ordinary exchange in the room, with decisions and consequences attached.
Because, in this argument, it still "has something very important to offer us for the new century" — the case is made before any definition of the term shows up.
Reading them produces "this awful nagging feeling that something absolutely essential is getting left out" — the loss is named, but not spelled out further here.
The claim is that such descriptions "open up a whole new world of excuses": they move the reason for what someone does away from the person doing it.
The reverse is reported: a line relays that Sartre said "he never really felt a day of despair in his life," which is used to argue the philosophy is not one of despair.
Not abstractly and not theologically: "It's you and me talking. Making decisions. Doing things and taking the consequences."
次のチャプター · 第 3 章at the whim ofThe Evolution Lecture
第 1 章on an even keelA Ride Full of Sea Metaphors
再生中 · 第 2 章write ourselves offSpeaker Defends Existentialism
第 3 章at the whim ofThe Evolution Lecture
第 4 章collective memoryTwo People Discuss Reincarnation
第 5 章charadeThe Free Will Lecture
第 6 章two sides of the same coinMan Rants About Control
第 7 章in the middle of nowhereGas Station Shooting Story
第 8 章make the best of itLucid Dreaming Tips and Tricks
第 9 章come out of the momentTwo People Debate What Film Captures
第 10 章be an antStrangers Talk About Not Being Ants
第 11 章beside the pointA Character in a Dream
第 12 章coauthors ofBridge Monologue on Dreams
第 13 章false awakeningsDreamer Describes False Awakenings