heard nothing about it
And I hadn't heard anything about it.The Thin Blue Line · 1988 — 第 13 / 20 章 · 5'01" · B2
The prosecution's case rests on people, not proof. One witness, by his own account, saw nothing until "wheels started rolling in his head about money" and he was ready to say whatever a paying side wanted; a salesman with supposed "total recall" admits, "I didn't see no bullet." The state's answer is simple: "We had to rely on witnesses."
The chapter shows how the case was made. One man says he heard the star witness admit he saw nothing, then watched him decide to testify "for enough money." The police concede they had no case from Adams's own statement alone: "We had to rely on witnesses." Even the judge admits the closing argument moved him.
注目の表現
wheels start rollinggo aheadtotal recallfigure out
このシーンの表現
start scheming
The coworker recalls how Miller read the papers and quietly started scheming about the reward money.
As soon as he saw the prize, the wheels started rolling.
proceed to do it
perfect memory
understand someone
obviously out of place
double negative for emphasis
73 行のセリフに 29 件のメモ
heard nothing about it
And I hadn't heard anything about it.carry something inside
And he brings in these newspapers...reported speech: Reported speech shifts the person and tense to match the speaker.
and he says he didn't see a thing. He couldn't see nothing, it was dark.saw nothing, nonstandard — Nonstandard speech; use anything in formal English.
and he says he didn't see a thing. He couldn't see nothing, it was dark.as he put it
Let me put it in his words.The gh in enough is silent and links into money.
For enough money, he would testify...object clause: The what-clause serves as the object of to and names their wanted words.
to what they wanted him to say.whatever they asked for
He would say anything they wanted him to say.very surprised that
I was shocked that he did go ahead...Stress did to mean he actually went ahead.
I was shocked that he did go ahead...see very well
Nobody has that good of an eyesight.question whether
I doubt if you could have even seen them with binoculars.modal perfect: Could have seen speculates about the past and rules the sighting out.
I doubt if you could have even seen them with binoculars.The t in total is often flapped, sounding like a d.
And you develop something like total recall.learn over time
Because it's a habit, something I just picked up.understand someone
I just stare intensely at people and try to figure them out.too curious about others — Casual and slightly critical; avoid in formal talk.
Being nosy, I just stare.stop a vehicle
I noticed an officer had two individuals pulled over...be very noticeable
he's a sore thumb, he stick out for the first reason.get someone stopped
but I know he had him pulled over, and he was up to the car.right at the car — Spoken shorthand; formal English says approached the car.
but I know he had him pulled over, and he was up to the car.The t in didn't often drops before see.
I didn't see no bullet. I didn't see no gunfire.relative clause: The that-clause modifies the time and pins down the moment.
positively as being the driver at the time that Wood was walking...a statement given willingly
with the voluntary statement that we got from Adams.parenthetical: The insert adds that every judge he knows does the same.
I always tried very hard, every judge I know of does...serving as a judge
to not show emotion on the bench.keep two things apart
that separated the public from anarchy.fill with tears
I have to concede that there my eyes kind of welled up...affect someone emotionally
It did get to me emotionally, but I don't think I showed it.This is the machinery of a conviction laid bare. A crucial witness, by one account, saw nothing at all — until, as the story goes, 'wheels started rolling in his head about money,' and he became willing to say whatever the side with money wanted said. Another witness sells himself as unusually reliable: 'I'm a salesman... you develop something like total recall,' then admits on tape, 'I didn't see no bullet. I didn't see no gunfire.' The police are frank that the case needed bodies in the courtroom: 'We had to rely on witnesses.' And the closing argument, the prosecutor's 'thin blue line' speech, is powerful enough that even the judge, who insists he shows no emotion on the bench, allows that it 'did get to me emotionally.' Testimony, money, and the pull of a good line — the chapter shows a verdict assembled from all three.
Wheels started rolling in his head about money.The witness's motive in one image: the case does not turn on memory or duty but on the calculation of what a testimony could be worth.
He would say anything they wanted him to say.The heart of the accusation: the man's account is for sale, and he will match it to whoever is paying rather than to what happened.
Nobody has that good of an eyesight.The plain objection to the identification: no one can really see a license plate and a face from that distance, so the certainty is not credible.
I doubt if you could have even seen them with binoculars.The same doubt, sharper: the sight line was so long that even binoculars would not have helped, which makes the courtroom ID impossible.
Doug Mulder's final argument was one I'd never heard before.The judge, who is meant to be neutral, singles out the prosecutor's closing as something new — the speech the film takes its title from.
It did get to me emotionally, but I don't think I showed it.The admission that both undercuts and confirms his pose: the argument moved him, and he still does not believe it showed.
By one account, he saw nothing until it occurred to him that a testimony could be worth money: "wheels started rolling in his head about money." He then offers to say whatever the paying side wants.
The witness presents himself as a salesman with an unusually exact memory. It is his way of justifying a courtroom identification, even though he admits, "I didn't see no bullet. I didn't see no gunfire."
The police say Adams's own voluntary statement was not enough to make a case: "We had to rely on witnesses." That is why the trial turns on what people claim to have seen rather than on physical proof.
It is the prosecutor's closing speech, invoking police as the thin line that keeps the public from anarchy. The film takes its title from it, and the judge admits the rhetoric "did get to me emotionally."
次のチャプター · 第 14 章without remorseDr. Grigson's Prison Test
第 1 章meant to beRandall Meets David at the Gas Station
第 2 章give a damnDetective Forces Adams to Sign
第 3 章graveyard shiftOfficer Wood Shot at Traffic Stop
第 4 章swear up and downDavid Harris Brags About the Killing
第 5 章come to find outRecounting the Night of the Shooting
第 6 章acting strangeRandall Recounts the Motel Night
第 7 章went blankAdams's Statement Labeled a Confession
第 8 章under the impressionThe Car With No Bullet Marks
第 9 章scot-freeDavid Harris Gets Off Scot-Free
第 10 章cover forWhy the Story Was Two Hours Late
第 11 章refreshed her memoryMrs. Miller Changes Her Story
第 12 章hinge onA Couple Witnesses the Shooting
再生中 · 第 13 章wheels start rollingWitnesses Testify for Money
第 14 章without remorseDr. Grigson's Prison Test
第 15 章put food on the tableDr. Death Takes the Stand
第 16 章hard-nosedRandall Adams on Death Row
第 17 章set the wheels of justice in motionThe Case the Supreme Court Reversed
第 18 章came over meDavid Harris's Same M.O.
第 19 章tore my head offThe Scales Are Not Balanced
第 20 章point-blank rangeDavid Harris Confesses in the Bayou