The Thin Blue Line · 1988 — 第 15 / 20 章 · 3'24" · B2

Dr. Death Takes the Stand, Explained:put food on the table

The prosecution's psychiatrist, Dr. Grigson — nicknamed "Dr. Death" because he always testifies this way — tells the court that Randall Adams will commit violent crimes if released. Adams answers with the obvious objection: "You can't tell what somebody's gonna do years from now." A juror, looking at the same evidence, ends up seeing David Harris as the killer.

あらすじ

The chapter follows the testimony that helped send Randall Adams to death row. Dr. Grigson, the prosecution's psychiatrist, tells the jury that Adams will commit violent crimes in the future, though he examined him for only fifteen minutes. The defense notes Adams had no prior record; a juror later says he believed David Harris was the real killer.

CourtroomInvestigationExplainingComplainingB2mediumamericanClean
IMDb ↗

注目の表現

Dr. Deathyears from nowhistory of violencework all day and creep all night

00:00 / 03:24
Space 再生 · ← → セリフ移動 · R リピート
いま
  1. ❝ 独白Adams answers the doctor17 行練習ページ ↗
セリフをタップするとそこから再生

このシーンの表現

put food on the table

earn a living

The prosecution says one can understand theft when a man is trying to put food on the table.

He works two jobs to put food on the table.

このシーンの他の表現

  • Dr. Death

    a nickname for a deadly doctor

  • years from now

    years in the future

  • history of violence

    a record of violent acts

  • work all day and creep all night

    seem normal by day, sinister by night

  • crime spree

    a run of crimes

このシーンのメモ一覧

56 行のセリフに 27 件のメモ

表現 · A2in the future

from now on

in the future if he was released.
文法 · B1if he was released

condition clause: The if-clause sets the condition under which the prediction would apply.

in the future if he was released.
表現 · C1a witness for/against someone

someone testifying for the state

that he's been a witness for the prosecution, he always testifies...
表現 · B1years from now

years in the future

The speaker rejects predicting the future: nobody can say what a person will do years from now.

You can't tell what somebody's gonna do years from now.
発音gonna do

Gonna do weakens and rushes together.

You can't tell what somebody's gonna do years from now.
スラング · A2gonna

going to, spoken — Everyday speech only; write going to.

You can't tell what somebody's gonna do years from now.
表現 · B1based on something

according to

Except based on your past record, which anybody can do.
表現 · B2a prior record

an earlier criminal record

Randall never had any prior record.
表現 · B2as far as I/we know

to our knowledge

And as far as we know, he never had any history of violence whatever.
スラング · B2creep

move secretly, sinister — Strongly negative; it paints someone as sneaky.

that can work all day and creep all night.
表現 · B2someone's mental state

psychological condition

of my mental state...
表現 · A2half of something

fifty percent of

I would go crazy and probably butcher half of Dallas County.
文法 · B1Even though he talked to me

concession clause: Even though marks a concession and sets up the contradiction.

Even though he talked to me 15 minutes...
表現 · C1prior convictions

earlier guilty verdicts

I have no prior convictions, no prior arrests...
文法 · B1no prior convictions

parallel negation: Two no-phrases in parallel pile up the denial.

I have no prior convictions, no prior arrests...
表現 · B1the rest of something

all the remaining time

he's stating that, that's enough.... For the rest of my life, watch me.
発音rest of my

Rest of my links up, with of nearly dropped.

he's stating that, that's enough.... For the rest of my life, watch me.
発音turn your

Turn your weakens, with your nearly reduced.

Don't ever turn your back on me. And he talked to me 15 minutes.
スラング · A2crazy

insane or absurd — Casual and blunt; formal English prefers irrational.

He's crazy.
表現 · B1ride around

drive with no purpose

would steal one to ride around in.
発音has to

Has to often collapses into hassa.

But it's very hard to understand why anybody has to kill a police officer.
表現 · B2the facts of a case

what the evidence shows

And I look at the facts of the case and say...
表現 · B2a criminal record

a history of convictions

had had a criminal record prior to stealing this car and these guns.
文法 · B2had had

past perfect: Had had places the earlier record before the car theft.

had had a criminal record prior to stealing this car and these guns.
表現 · B1brag about something

boast about something

went right back home and bragged about it to his friends.
表現 · B2it is X that counts

that is what mattered

And it was their verdict that counted.
文法 · B2it was their verdict that counted

cleft sentence: The cleft structure puts all the weight on the verdict.

And it was their verdict that counted.

「Dr. Death Takes the Stand」を読み解く

What's really going on

The chapter is about a prediction dressed up as evidence. Dr. Grigson — 'known as "Dr. Death" because he always testifies that way' — tells the jury what Randall Adams will do years into the future, a claim the defense treats as impossible: 'You can't tell what somebody's gonna do years from now.' Adams, in his own words, is turned into a monster in the space of an interview: 'He called me Charlie Manson. He called me Adolf Hitler.' The record says otherwise — 'Randall never had any prior record' — so the prognosis is doing the work that facts cannot. By the end, a juror has drawn the opposite conclusion from the same evidence: he believes David Harris committed the murder, 'and it was their verdict that counted.' The chapter's subject is not who pulled the trigger but how a confident voice on the stand can hand a jury its certainty.

Theme

JusticeA fifteen-minute interview becomes a forecast of future murder, and the jury's verdict, not the evidence, decides a man's life.
DeceptionGrigson's certainty about the future is dressed as expertise, while the man he describes has no record and no history of violence.

このチャプターで学べること

  • A crime spree is a run of connected crimes.
  • 'Brag about' means to boast, usually in a bad way.
  • A verdict is the decision that finally counts.
  • 'Put food on the table' means earning a living.

発音のポイント

  • gonna do — Gonna do weakens and rushes together.
  • rest of my — Rest of my links up, with of nearly dropped.
  • turn your — Turn your weakens, with your nearly reduced.
  • has to — Has to often collapses into hassa.
Grigson is known as "Dr. Death" because he always testifies that way.

The nickname, explained in one line: the doctor's testimony is not a medical finding so much as a repeated script that nearly always points to future violence.

You can't tell what somebody's gonna do years from now.

The defense's core objection: predicting someone's future conduct is guesswork, and no expert can honestly claim to know it.

And as far as we know, he never had any history of violence whatever.

The fact the prediction ignores: Adams had no record and nothing violent in his past, so the expert's warning rests on no history at all.

I would go crazy and probably butcher half of Dallas County.

Grigson's courtroom image of Adams, quoted back by Adams himself: the release of this man will supposedly unleash a slaughter across the county.

Don't ever turn your back on me. And he talked to me 15 minutes.

The absurdity in two beats: a lifetime of threats from a man who spent fifteen minutes with him, and the order never to turn your back.

But it's very hard to understand why anybody has to kill a police officer.

Said of the one crime the speaker cannot excuse even while understanding theft, addiction, and a boy stealing a car: killing an officer is a step with no need behind it.

And it was their verdict that counted.

The chapter's closing note: whatever one juror believed, the verdict the jury reached is what decided Randall's fate.

このシーンについての質問

Who is 'Dr. Death'?

Dr. Grigson, the prosecution's psychiatrist. He earned the nickname because he testifies for the prosecution in nearly every case that the defendant will commit violent crimes in the future.

How long did Dr. Grigson examine Randall Adams?

About fifteen minutes, according to Adams. On that basis, Grigson told the jury that Adams would go crazy and 'probably butcher half of Dallas County' if released.

What did the defense say about Adams's record?

That he had none. As the defense puts it, Randall never had any prior record or any history of violence, which undercuts the prediction that he was a future killer.

Why does one juror believe David Harris did it?

Looking at the same facts — the stolen car, the guns, the crime spree, the bragging afterward — that juror concluded David Harris was the killer. But he was outvoted: "it was their verdict that counted."

The Thin Blue Line · 全 20 章

すべて見る →
第 15 / 20 章 · 残り約 20 分