00:00 / 03:06
00:00 / 03:06

Eduardo's Chicken Deposition Story, Explained

The Social Network · 2010

Capítulo 17 de 23 · 3'06"

A deposition digs up a college scandal: Eduardo was accused of animal cruelty for carrying a chicken during his club initiation and feeding it chicken at dinner — "forced cannibalism." He insists he meant no harm, then jokes that being accused of necrophilia would have been better.

CourtroomInterrogationsExplainingConfrontingRivalsB2fastamericanClean

Key moments

Start here, then watch the full scene
  1. ❝ Monólogo · 7 frases Eduardo's Chicken Story

    1:32–2:18
    46s
  1. ❝ MonólogoThe dining-hall chicken confession7 frasesPracticar ↗

Eduardo's Chicken Deposition Story, explained

What happens

During a deposition, the lawyer surprises Eduardo with an old Crimson article accusing him of animal cruelty. He explains: for his club initiation he had to keep a chicken with him for a week, and at dinner he fed it pieces of chicken. Somehow that became forced cannibalism. Mark is questioned about cheating in the same session.

What's really going on

The scene uses an absurd anecdote to expose something real: in these depositions, any old detail can be turned into a weapon. Eduardo's story — a club ritual, a chicken, a few pieces of meat — is comically harmless, and the charge against him has been blown into "forced cannibalism." His line, "I didn't know you couldn't do that," is funny because it admits exactly how innocent the whole episode was, and it also shows how far the lawyers will reach to damage a witness. The humor cuts both ways: the accusation is ridiculous, and so is the fact that it is being read into the record at all. Meanwhile, a small slip pulls Mark into the same trap.

Key lines & what they mean

“I didn't know you couldn't do that.”
The innocent core of the story: he broke no rule he knew of, which is what makes the charge so absurd.
“It's better to be accused of necrophilia.”
A dark joke that measures the ridiculousness of the accusation by comparing it to something far worse.
“I'm not the expert, but being connected to torturing animals is probably bad for business.”
The practical worry underneath the comedy: the story matters because it can hurt the company.
“Now I have to explain this to my father. I'm gonna have to explain this to everybody.”
The real cost, spoken plainly: an old joke is about to be retold in front of everyone who matters.

Theme

  • Justice — Lawyers weaponize a trivial college anecdote, showing how a lawsuit can turn any detail into evidence.
  • Betrayal — Old history and private incidents are dragged into the open when friends become opposing parties.

Qué aprendes en este capítulo

Puntos de enseñanza

Repasa justo después de ver
Mi nivel1/5

A1–C2 es la escala MCER. Las tarjetas por encima del nivel elegido se atenúan y la reproducción no se pausa en ellas.

The Social Network: tu progreso

Capítulo 17 de 23 · quedan unos 20 min

← Anterior
Siguiente · 18once-in-a-generationLa escena: Sean Parker Meets Mark in Palo Alto

Preguntas frecuentes

La pregunta, luego la frase
Why was Eduardo accused of animal cruelty?

During his club initiation he had to carry a chicken for a week, and one night at dinner he fed it pieces of chicken. Someone reported it, and the story became an accusation of forced cannibalism.

Did Eduardo actually torture the chicken?

No. He fed it chicken from the dining hall, which he thought was harmless. The scene plays the charge as absurd and shows how a joke can be turned into evidence in a lawsuit.

What does the lawyer get out of bringing up the chicken story?

It embarrasses Eduardo and makes him look bad, which serves Mark's side in the case. The scene shows how far the lawyers will dig, since the accusation has nothing to do with the ownership dispute.

What happens to Mark in this scene?

He is asked about cheating on a final exam and refuses to answer, which is taken as an admission. Then it emerges that Eduardo defended him when the animal-cruelty story came up, making Mark's silence look worse.